AI detectors = not so smart after all? |
|
Christopher Penn, co-founder and Chief Data Scientist at TrustInsights.ai, just dropped a truth bomb about AI detectors on LinkedIn. Spoiler alert: they're not as clever as you might’ve thought. |
|
Here's the scoop: Penn ran the U.S. Declaration of Independence through an AI detector (you know, tools like ZeroGPT that claim to sniff out AI-generated content). |
|
The result? ZeroGPT said the Declaration of Independence had a 97% chance of being AI-generated. Wait, what? Did Thomas Jefferson have a time machine and a ChatGPT subscription? |
|
|
|
Nope. Turns out, AI detectors aren't exactly rocket science. Here's why they goofed: |
|
|
|
Penn's verdict? “AI detectors are worthless.” Ouch. |
|
So what's the solution? Penn suggests we humans need to prove our work's authenticity, kind of like how fancy cheeses come with certificates of origin. |
|
Funny enough, on Tuesday, Adobe announced an app coming out next year that lets creators add that kind of digital signature to their work to prove it's human-made. |
|
Our take: If the Founding Fathers can be mistaken for AI, we're all in trouble. Want to sound more human in your writing (whether you're using AI or not)? Try these tips: |
|
|
|
Remember, the goal isn't to trick AI detectors—it's to communicate effectively and authentically. |